Can a buddy system keep your workers safe?

The buddy system has long been a popular solution for keeping remote workers safe and reducing the risk of injuries or fatalities. When remote workers face emergency situations without anyone nearby to help, the buddy system keeps two workers together at all times, significantly reducing the possibility of danger. Nevertheless, while the buddy system appears as an ideal solution, it presents some clear drawbacks.

Here are the three main issues to keep in mind when considering the use of the buddy system for worker safety:

1. Buddy systems are costly

The buddy system requires employers to hire two workers to carry out jobs that, in many cases, could be done by one person. Therefore, the cost of labor is more than double what it would be if one worker is hired. This can place a significant dent in a company's budget. While safety is a top priority, companies should seek a cost-effective, less expensive solution as an alternative to the buddy system. Many of our customers contact us because they're looking to replace their busy system with a cheaper option. Read more about the price of lone worker alarms.

2. Employees may lower their guard

When working alone, employees are usually alert and conscious of any potential hazards. But when working in pairs, they may not be as vigilant since they feel more secure with another employee around. As a result, they may overlook some of the potential risks and become complacent in their work. Employers should ensure that, in addition to the buddy system, they provide regular training and reminders to employees for working safely. This will help lone workers remain vigilant and conscious of their surroundings at all times.

3. Emergencies may affect both workers

While the buddy system can provide an added layer of protection for remote workers, it may not be foolproof in some scenarios. It's important to note that many of the hazards and dangers that remote workers face have the potential to affect both workers at the same time, which is not addressed by the buddy system. For example, weather conditions, car accidents, or a criminal can suddenly render both workers unable to raise an alert or call for help, making the buddy system ineffective in such emergencies. To avoid these situations, employers should consider implementing comprehensive workplace safety solutions such as wearables, detailed safety protocols and resources for workers, and alerts that can quickly send out distress calls in emergency situations (e.g. a Red Alert).

In summary, while the buddy system provides some protection for remote workers, it still leaves loopholes that should be accounted for. Employers must ensure that their lone workers are well-protected and have access to comprehensive safety solutions that can help in emergencies. Companies should explore less expensive but effective alternatives for their lone workers' safety and seek to provide regular training and reminders to maintain workers' vigilance.

To learn more about alternative ways to protect your lone workers, please contact us.